Beyond Cashless Transactions: A Systems Theory Approach to Digital Ecosystem Integration and Socio-Economic Resilience Among Mumbai's Street Vendors
 
Mark Menezes¹*, Shivangani Rathore²
¹ Research Scholar, The ICFAI University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
markm.phd2021@iujaipur.edu.in
² Assistant Professor, ICFAI Business School, The ICFAI University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Abstract: Digitalization has transformed financial transactions globally, yet its role in informal economies requires deeper exploration. Street vendors in cities like Mumbai operate at the margins of financial systems, where survival is shaped by both digital tools and broader socio-economic dynamics. The research objectives include assessing adoption levels and usage frequency, measuring resilience indicators such as income stability, savings, and crisis absorption, mapping systemic interactions among vendors and platforms. Structured quantitative design was applied, for survey data from 350 vendors across Mumbai, analyzed using correlation and regression techniques. Results confirm awareness significantly enhances utilization (r = 0.634, p < 0.01) and utilization positively impacts performance (r = 0.551, p < 0.01). Unexpectedly, higher challenges correlated with greater adoption (r = 0.251, p < 0.01), indicating resilience under constraint. The findings highlight both reinforcing and constraining feedback loops within digital ecosystems to inform policymakers and financial institutions on designing inclusive digital interventions.
Keywords: Digital Payment Adoption, Street Vendors, Systems Theory, Socio-Economic Resilience, Informal Economy, Financial Inclusion, Mumbai, Crisis Adaptation
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Contextual Background
Mumbai’s informal economy is deeply interwoven into the city’s urban life, with street vendors forming a crucial component of its socio-economic fabric. Vendors not only provide affordable goods and services but also sustain livelihoods for migrant and low-income groups (Breman, 2023). Their operations, however, remain precarious due to irregular earnings, lack of social protection, and dependency on cash-based transactions. The government’s financial inclusion efforts and the growing penetration of digital infrastructure have increasingly positioned digital payments as a transformative tool in this sector (Sripriya, 2022).
The rise of digital payment systems, particularly Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and mobile wallets like PayTM, has accelerated India’s transition toward a less cash-dependent economy. Malik et al. (2021) highlight how demonetization in 2016 and later the COVID-19 pandemic pushed both consumers and vendors to adopt contactless payment methods, reshaping transactional practices. This transition not only enabled continuity of trade during mobility restrictions but also highlighted the systemic role of digital platforms in crisis absorption. Kanougiya et al. (2021) emphasize that adoption levels vary, influenced by literacy gaps, transaction costs, and infrastructural limitations. Within a systems perspective, these barriers interact with broader state interventions such as the PM SVANidhi scheme, which aims to formalize vendor credit access (Páv, 2023).
Thus, Mumbai’s street vending economy exemplifies how digital payment integration intersects with income stability, savings behavior, and adaptive resilience, while simultaneously revealing systemic inequalities that shape ecosystem participation.
1.2 Problem Statement
Research on cashless systems has largely emphasized efficiency, convenience, and financial inclusion, yet such transactional views remain limited in capturing the complexity of informal economies like Mumbai’s street vending sector. Rui et al. (2023) argue that focusing solely on digital adoption rates obscures broader systemic dynamics that determine resilience and adaptability. Similarly, Raya and Vargas (2022) highlight that digital payment tools may enhance immediacy of transactions but do not automatically translate into income stability or crisis preparedness for vulnerable groups.
The COVID-19 pandemic and earlier demonetization revealed that vendors’ survival depends not only on access to platforms such as UPI and PayTM but also on systemic linkages with state credit schemes and consumer trust (Pang et al., 2022). Without examining these interdependencies, assessments risk overlooking barriers such as literacy gaps, network failures, and transaction costs that hinder sustainable integration (Kirobo et al., 2022). Apanel (2025) stresses that Systems Theory offers a framework to map these interactions, viewing vendors, digital platforms, and policies as interconnected components.
Therefore, a systemic resilience analysis is essential to move beyond narrow measures of digital uptake and to understand how digital ecosystems shape socio-economic stability for street vendors.
1.3 Theoretical Framework
Systems Theory, first advanced by Bertalanffy (1968), provides a lens to analyze digital ecosystems as interconnected structures where vendors, platforms, policymakers, and infrastructure mutually shape outcomes. Rather than viewing digital payment adoption as an isolated behavior, Systems Theory emphasizes interdependence, feedback, and adaptive capacity across actors within the ecosystem.
In the case of Mumbai’s street vendors, adoption of platforms such as UPI and PayTM can be understood as part of a broader system where vendors’ adaptability is influenced by consumer demand, technological infrastructure, and state interventions. Septiningrum et al. (2024) stress that interdependent subsystems enhance resilience when linkages between actors are strong, while weak connections create vulnerability. Rahman et al. (2022) similarly argue that socio economic resilience emerges from interactions among financial tools, regulatory structures, and community practices.
Mogaji and Nguyen (2024) highlight that digital ecosystems function dynamically, with feedback loops that can either reinforce inclusion or perpetuate exclusion depending on access barriers. Namahoot and Jantasri (2023) show that trust, literacy, and perceived usefulness directly influence systemic adoption, while Tanha et al. (2024) note that resilient outcomes depend on integration of policy support and technological accessibility.
Thus, Systems Theory grounds this study by mapping interdependencies that connect adoption practices to resilience capacities.
1.4 Research Objectives & Hypotheses
1.4.1 Hypotheses
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Digital Payment Adoption in Informal Sectors
The adoption of digital payments within the informal sector has attracted increasing scholarly attention, particularly in relation to the Global South. Evidence from mobile money innovations such as M-Pesa in Kenya demonstrates how financial technologies can reshape transaction practices, improve liquidity, and expand financial inclusion despite structural constraints (Suri & Jack, 2016). In the context of Mumbai’s street vendors, similar dynamics are evident, where Unified Payments Interface and mobile wallets provide opportunities for efficiency, record keeping, and visibility in economic networks.
However, the uptake of these platforms is not uniform, and barriers persist. Osabutey and Jackson (2024) emphasize that low digital literacy, lack of trust in financial institutions, and inadequate infrastructure restrict wider adoption. Shaikh et al. (2023) find that vendors often perceive transaction fees and inconsistent network connectivity as significant deterrents. Mpofu (2022) highlights that gender and educational differences influence adoption, as women vendors frequently face additional constraints in accessing and using digital platforms.
In addition to individual barriers, systemic factors shape vendor engagement with digital payments. Qatawneh et al. (2025) argue that institutional support and regulatory clarity are vital in strengthening digital ecosystems. Government initiatives such as PM SVANidhi loans can act as enabling mechanisms, yet their impact is contingent on vendor awareness and administrative accessibility. Mogaji and Nguyen (2022) suggest that digital adoption is also linked to broader notions of socio-economic resilience, as regular usage fosters savings discipline and buffers against shocks. Similarly, Dzandu et al. (2022) underline the role of trust and social networks in normalizing digital payments within community settings.
Overall, digital adoption among Mumbai’s street vendors illustrates a complex interplay between individual adaptability, platform design, and policy environments. From a systems theory perspective, these interconnected dimensions reveal how adoption patterns not only facilitate transactions but also reinforce resilience capacities within the urban informal economy.
2.2 Socio-Economic Resilience Metrics
Socio-economic resilience among street vendors reflects their ability to maintain stability, adapt to disruptions, and recover from shocks. Aldrich and Meyer (2015) describe resilience as a multidimensional construct that includes income stability, savings accumulation, and crisis absorption capacity. For Mumbai’s vendors, these dimensions are critical, given their dependence on daily cash flows and exposure to sudden disruptions such as demonetization and the COVID-19 pandemic.
During crises, vendors with consistent digital payment use demonstrated greater financial continuity. Aditya and Amri (2023) highlight that digital tools enhanced income stability by reducing reliance on cash transactions and enabling smoother access to customers. Sarkar et al. (2025) emphasize that vendors leveraging Unified Payments Interface platforms reported higher capacity to save and reinvest earnings, which supported long-term adaptability. Paliwal et al. (2024) observe that savings behavior was closely linked with regular digital transactions, as digital records facilitated both personal discipline and credibility with financial institutions.
Shock absorption remains another important metric. Pitoyo et al. (2021) illustrate that informal workers who engaged with digital platforms were better able to diversify income sources and access emergency support schemes. Agarwal et al. (2023) argue that government interventions such as PM SVANidhi loans play a role in enhancing resilience, though awareness and procedural complexities limit outreach. Mondal and Chakraborty (2022) further show that digital inclusion strengthens vendor networks, where peer exchanges of knowledge and trust fostered coping strategies during economic uncertainty.
Taken together, these findings suggest that resilience is not merely a function of individual effort but emerges from the interaction of personal adaptability, digital infrastructure, and supportive policies. From a systems theory perspective, these interconnected factors demonstrate how digital adoption both enables stability and embeds vendors within wider structures of resilience in urban informal economies.
2.3 Systems Theory in Digital Ecosystems
Systems Theory provides a useful lens to understand how digital payments interact with socio-economic resilience in informal markets. The approach emphasizes interdependence, feedback, and adaptation across multiple actors. In the case of Mumbai’s street vendors, this perspective captures how vendors, fintech platforms, banks, and government policies function as interconnected nodes shaping adoption and resilience outcomes. Wang (2021) argues that digital ecosystems are complex systems where actors continuously co-evolve through technological, financial, and regulatory linkages.
Actor network interactions illustrate this complexity. Vendors rely on fintech platforms such as Unified Payments Interface and PayTM for daily transactions, which connect them to banks and institutional credit. Márton (2022) observes that such integration creates positive spillovers, including improved access to financial products and enhanced credibility for informal workers. Mariana et al. (2025) note that ecosystems also generate systemic vulnerabilities, as disruptions in digital infrastructure or policy misalignments can weaken resilience across the network.
Empirical research on these dynamics in street vending remains limited. Alaassar et al. (2022) highlight that few studies apply systems perspectives quantitatively, leaving gaps in understanding measurable impacts of digital adoption on vendor livelihoods. Kumar et al. (2021) emphasize that systems thinking reveals feedback loops, where consistent use of digital platforms increases vendor visibility, which in turn enhances access to credit and institutional support, reinforcing resilience capacities. Putrevu and Mertzanis (2024) further argue that government initiatives, when embedded in digital ecosystems, act as stabilizing mechanisms, although barriers such as literacy and uneven access hinder full integration.
Overall, a systems approach illustrates that digital payment adoption is not an isolated choice but part of a larger adaptive cycle. The interactions between vendors, platforms, and policies reveal both opportunities and vulnerabilities, underscoring the need for integrative strategies that strengthen digital ecosystems while safeguarding the resilience of informal workers.
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Design
The study employed a positivist design to objectively assess the relationship between digital adoption and socio-economic resilience among Mumbai’s street vendors. Positivism, as emphasized by Maksimovic and Evtimov (2023), enables structured inquiry by focusing on observable relationships, while Jaja et al. (2022) highlight its value in producing generalizable findings. A quantitative approach was adopted to allow measurable testing of hypotheses, consistent with Ghanad (2023) and Jamieson et al. (2023). The sample consisted of 350 street vendors’ selected using stratified random sampling, following recommendations from Nguyen et al. (2023) and Makwana et al. (2023) for representative data collection in informal contexts.
3.2 Data Collection
Primary data were gathered through a structured survey designed to capture vendors’ awareness, utilization, resilience indicators, and perceived challenges. Surveys remain one of the most effective methods for quantitative social research, as discussed by Jebb et al. (2023), since they allow systematic measurement across large populations. South et al. (2022) emphasize that surveys facilitate comparability, while Tanujaya et al. (2022) note their suitability for assessing perceptions and behavioral patterns. The instrument included both Likert-scale and categorical items, ensuring standardized responses. Surveys were administered face to face to enhance reliability, considering literacy variations within the street vending population in Mumbai.
3.3 Data Analysis (SPSS)
The collected data were processed and analyzed using SPSS software, which provides robust statistical tools for social science research. Okagbue et al. (2021) identify SPSS as particularly effective for handling large-scale survey data, while Sen and Yildirim (2022) confirm its reliability in ensuring accuracy in inferential statistics. Correlation analysis was applied to examine relationships among variables, and ANOVA was employed to test group differences. Mondal et al. (2024) highlight the suitability of these methods for resilience-related studies, and Yu et al. (2022) demonstrate their effectiveness in identifying both significance and strength of associations in quantitative research contexts.
4. RESULTS
4.1 Descriptive Statistics
Figure 1: Age
The age distribution of urban street vendors shows that the majority are in their most productive years. Vendors aged 31 to 40 years represent 36.6 percent while those aged 41 to 50 years account for 33.1 percent. Together they make up nearly seventy percent of the total sample. A smaller share of 5.7 percent falls in the 14 to 20 years group which indicates that younger people are less engaged in this trade. Older vendors aged 60 and above form 9.1 percent reflecting that many continue to work beyond traditional retirement age.
Figure 2: Gender
Gender analysis reveals that 65.1 percent of vendors are male while 34.9 percent are female. This shows that men dominate the sector possibly due to the physical demands of vending or social norms that shape occupational choices. However the significant presence of women highlights their crucial contribution to household incomes and urban informal economies.
Figure 3: Experience
Experience levels suggest that most vendors are recent entrants. About 65.7 percent have been working for 0 to 5 years while 34.3 percent have 6 to 10 years of experience. This high proportion of relatively new participants may point to economic pressures or job displacement leading individuals to adopt vending as a livelihood.
Figure 4: Education
Educational levels vary widely among vendors. The largest group at 31.1 percent has completed secondary education. This is followed by 24.9 percent with higher secondary and 22.9 percent with primary schooling. Only 14.3 percent are graduates or above while 6.9 percent have no formal education. The figures reflect that vending is largely carried out by individuals with basic education.
Figure 5: Type of Goods Sold
The type of goods sold shows considerable diversity. Street food vendors dominate with 34.3 percent while beverages are sold by 17.4 percent and miscellaneous other items by 17.1 percent. Vendors in fruits and vegetables account for 15.4 percent and those selling clothes footwear and accessories represent 14.6 percent. Electronics form the smallest category at 1.1 percent.
Figure 6: Usage reason for Digital Tools
The use of digital tools demonstrates gradual technological adaptation. Payments lead with 25.1 percent of vendors using digital platforms for transactions. Customer relationship management is practiced by 18.3 percent and promotion by 15.7 percent. About 14.0 percent use digital tools for accounts while 13.4 percent each apply them for delivery or report no use at all.
4.2 Hypothesis Testing
Table 1 Analysis of Hypothesis 1
Correlations
 
Awareness_Score
Utilization_Score
Awareness_Score
Pearson Correlation
1
.634**
 
Sig. (2-tailed)
 
.000
 
N
350
350
Utilization_Score
Pearson Correlation
.634**
1
 
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
 
 
N
350
350
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
 
The results confirm Hypothesis H1 as there is a strong positive correlation between awareness and utilization of digital tools with r = 0.634 and p < 0.01. The relationship is statistically significant at the 0.01 level showing that greater awareness leads to higher utilization among street vendors.
Table 2 Analysis of Hypothesis 2
Correlations
 
Utilization_Score
Performance_Score
Utilization_Score
Pearson Correlation
1
.551**
 
Sig. (2-tailed)
 
.000
 
N
350
350
Performance_Score
Pearson Correlation
.551**
1
 
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
 
 
N
350
350
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
 
The findings support Hypothesis H2 as utilization of digitalization tools shows a significant positive relationship with business performance with r = 0.551 and p < 0.01. The correlation is moderate to strong and statistically significant at the 0.01 level, confirming that greater utilization enhances performance among urban street vendors.
Table 3: Analysis of Hypothesis 3
Correlations
 
Challenges_Score
Utilization_Score
Challenges_Score
Pearson Correlation
1
.251**
 
Sig. (2-tailed)
 
.000
 
N
350
350
Utilization_Score
Pearson Correlation
.251**
1
 
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
 
 
N
350
350
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
 
Hypothesis H3 is rejected as the correlation analysis shows a significant positive relationship between perceived challenges and utilization with r = 0.251 and p < 0.01. Instead of a negative link, higher challenges are associated with greater adoption, indicating vendors continue to use digital tools despite facing obstacles.
Table 4: Analysis of Hypothesis 4
Model Summary
Model
R
R Square
Adjusted R Square
Std. Error of the Estimate
1
.551a
.303
.301
.64214
a. Predictors: (Constant), Utilization_Score
 
ANOVAa
Model
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
1
Regression
62.526
1
62.526
151.637
.000b
 
Residual
143.495
348
.412
 
 
 
Total
206.022
349
 
 
 
a. Dependent Variable: Performance_Score
b. Predictors: (Constant), Utilization_Score
 
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
t
Sig.
 
B
Std. Error
Beta
 
 
1
(Constant)
2.172
.150
 
14.500
.000
 
Utilization_Score
.500
.041
.551
12.314
.000
a. Dependent Variable: Performance_Score
 
The results support Hypothesis H4 as regression shows a significant positive impact of digitalization utilization on vendor performance with R = .551 and R² = .303. The standardized beta value of .551 and F(1,348) = 151.637 with p < .001 confirm that digital tools significantly enhance business outcomes.
4.3 Additional Insights
Table 5: Descriptive Statistics
Descriptive Statistics
 
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
I am aware of various digitalization tools that can be incorporated into my business.
350
1
5
4.28
.887
I understand that digitalization can increase my customer reach and can help me effectively manage my business.
350
1
5
4.26
.888
Digitalization can result in improved business performance for my street vending business.
350
1
5
4.31
.827
I am aware that digital tools can be used for online orders, delivery, inventory management, and marketing.
350
1
5
4.23
.866
I know that social media can be used to increase the reach of my business to customers.
350
1
5
4.06
.930
I often use digitalization for managing my street vending business.
350
1
5
4.08
.987
I utilize digital and social media marketing for the promotion of my business.
350
1
5
3.53
1.117
I use digital tools for ordering inventories and tracking sales.
350
1
5
3.40
1.214
I apply digital solutions to increase the productivity and efficiency of my business.
350
1
5
3.41
1.119
I am very likely to invest more money in further digitalization of my business.
350
1
5
3.54
.994
Digitalization can be effectively used for the promotion of business.
350
1
5
4.03
.753
The number of customers can be rapidly increased by using digital marketing and social media marketing.
350
1
5
4.04
.780
Digitalization facilitates effective communication with customers.
350
1
5
3.98
.764
It is easy to manage customer feedback and complaints using digital tools.
350
1
5
3.78
.890
Digital platforms like Zomato, Porter, and Swiggy can be used to make home deliveries to customers.
350
1
5
3.91
.866
The sales of the product rise as businesses start making home deliveries.
350
1
5
4.02
.812
Financial investment in digitalization is a major barrier for me.
350
1
5
3.69
1.133
A lack of digital literacy keeps me from adopting more digital tools for my business.
350
1
5
3.93
1.021
Data security and privacy concerns are major barriers to the adoption of digital tools.
350
1
5
3.67
1.051
Financial fraud is a major concern for me while utilizing digital technologies for the daily operations of my business.
350
1
5
3.86
.932
It is difficult to keep up to date with the latest technologies that can be used for digitalization.
350
1
5
3.89
.940
It is hard to integrate digital tools into existing businesses.
350
1
5
3.31
1.218
Digitalization increases the visibility of business to potential customers.
350
1
5
4.06
.791
Digitalization has significantly increased revenue from my business.
350
1
5
4.04
.874
Digitalization has improved the operational efficiency of my business.
350
1
5
3.81
1.007
Inventory management becomes easier after digitalization.
350
1
5
3.74
1.145
Digitalization helps me adapt to market trends and the needs of the customers.
350
1
5
4.00
.962
Customer satisfaction is significantly improved after the digitalization of business operations.
350
1
5
4.16
.883
Valid N (listwise)
350
 
 
 
 
 
The descriptive statistics reveal strong awareness and positive perceptions of digitalization among street vendors. Awareness of digital tools scored a mean of 4.28 while belief in improved business performance reached 4.31. Understanding of digital reach and management scored 4.26 and awareness of multiple applications scored 4.23. Practical usage is moderate with social media promotion at 3.53 and inventory tracking at 3.40. Barriers remain with financial investment concerns at 3.69 and lack of digital literacy at 3.93. Customer satisfaction after digitalization scored 4.16 and revenue improvement 4.04 indicating overall benefits despite challenges such as integration difficulty at 3.31.
5. DISCUSSIONS
5.1 Key Interpretations
The results highlight both positive and negative dimensions of digital adoption among Mumbai’s street vendors when examined through the lens of Systems Theory. Systems Theory emphasizes that outcomes emerge from interactions among interdependent actors rather than isolated behaviors, and the findings reveal reinforcing as well as constraining feedback loops.
The confirmation of Hypothesis 1 shows that awareness strongly correlates with utilization. This finding aligns with Shahid (2022), who explains that awareness functions as an entry point for integration within socio-technical systems, creating pathways for higher engagement. Similarly, the support for Hypothesis 2 and 4 indicates that digital utilization enhances business performance. Kumar and Unnisa (2024) argue that such improvements reflect the strengthening of adaptive capacity, where vendors’ consistent use of tools produces self-reinforcing cycles of growth and resilience. George et al. (2023) add that digitalization often extends networks of exchange, improving access to customers and institutional actors, which resonates with vendors’ reported performance gains.
The rejection of Hypothesis 3 presents an unexpected outcome, as challenges were positively linked with utilization. Khan (2023) interprets similar patterns as evidence of resilience under constraint, where actors continue engaging with systems despite obstacles to avoid exclusion. This aligns with Mahesh and Bhat (2021), who emphasize that informal workers often exhibit persistence and adaptability, integrating digital practices even when barriers such as literacy gaps or financial concerns exist.
The descriptive results also point to tensions. While awareness and perceptions are high, usage in advanced areas such as inventory tracking remains moderate. Mathew et al. (2024) suggest that uneven adoption reflects systemic asymmetries where some elements of the ecosystem are more accessible than others. Barriers identified, including financial costs and literacy challenges, mirror findings by Cornelli et al. (2024) who note that incomplete integration generates friction across networks. Badak et al. (2023) further stress that customer expectations shape system dynamics, with positive satisfaction reinforcing continued adoption, while unresolved integration difficulties risk creating points of system fragility.
Hence, the results demonstrate that digital adoption in informal economies functions as a dynamic system. Positive feedback loops enhance performance and resilience, but persistent barriers reveal vulnerabilities that need targeted interventions to ensure balanced ecosystem integration.
5.2 Theoretical Contributions
This study contributes theoretically by applying systems theory to urban street vending and demonstrating how digitalization fosters resilience through interconnected networks of vendors, platforms, and policy structures. It expands existing literature by showing that digital adoption extends beyond payment systems to broader business practices, thereby shaping resilience as an emergent property of adaptive systems. From a managerial perspective, the findings highlight that digital tools can enhance vendor competitiveness, customer engagement, and operational sustainability. Managers, policymakers, and platform providers can design inclusive interventions that address barriers such as literacy and financial access while reinforcing trust, integration, and long-term value for vendors.
5.3 Policy Recommendations
6. CONCLUSION
6.1 Summary
The study explores how digitalization influences the socio-economic resilience of Mumbai’s urban street vendors through a systems theory perspective. Findings suggest that vendors are increasingly adopting digital tools not only for payments but also for promotion, customer relationship management, and delivery, reflecting gradual integration into a broader digital ecosystem. The descriptive analysis highlights diverse demographics, education levels, and business types, showing that digitalization is accessible across different vendor categories.
The hypothesis testing indicates strong links between awareness, utilization, and improved business performance, while unexpected associations between challenges and adoption suggest resilience and adaptability among vendors. These insights underscore that digital tools serve beyond transactional convenience by enhancing vendor competitiveness, customer satisfaction, and long-term sustainability.
The systems theory approach situates vendors within interconnected networks involving digital platforms, government policies, and socio-economic dynamics, showing that resilience is strengthened through these interactions. While barriers such as limited literacy and financial constraints persist, vendors demonstrate a willingness to adapt and leverage digital ecosystems. Overall, the findings emphasize that digitalization acts as both a driver of business growth and a pathway to socio-economic resilience for urban vendors, highlighting their crucial role in inclusive urban development.
6.2 Limitations
The study is limited by its reliance on self-reported survey data, which may introduce response bias. The cross-sectional design restricts causal inference between digital adoption and resilience. Research is geographically focused on Mumbai, limiting generalizability to other contexts. Key aspects such as long-term performance, vendor networks, and platform governance remain unexplored. Some potential external influences like informal credit practices, seasonal variations, or cultural norms were not captured. Broader multi-city studies, ethnographic approaches, and longitudinal analyses are needed to validate and expand these findings beyond the current research scope.
6.3 Future Research
Future scholars shall explore longitudinal patterns of digital adoption to examine long-term business resilience and growth among vendors. Studies may investigate how ecosystem-level policies, transaction infrastructures, and informal networks mediate adoption outcomes. Comparative research across cities and countries can reveal how contextual factors shape integration into digital systems. Qualitative approaches such as ethnography could provide deeper insights into vendor experiences, decision-making, and trust dynamics with digital platforms. Further research may also assess the role of artificial intelligence, fintech innovations, and digital cooperatives in strengthening vendor resilience.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to express sincere gratitude to all the street vendors in Mumbai who participated in the survey and generously shared their experiences and perspectives. Their valuable contributions made this study possible. The author also acknowledges the support and guidance received during the development of this research and appreciates the assistance of all individuals who contributed to the completion of the study.
 
References
  1. Aditya, B. and Amri, I. (2023) ‘Rethinking informal economy resilience during crisis: Experience from COVID-19 pandemic’, The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Vol. 66 No. 3, pp. 711–737.
  2. Agarwal, V., Mathiyazhagan, K., Malhotra, S. and Pimpunchat, B. (2023) ‘Building resilience for sustainability of MSMEs post COVID-19 outbreak: An Indian handicraft industry outlook’, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 85, p. 101443.
  3. Alaassar, A., Mention, A.L. and Aas, T.H. (2022) ‘Ecosystem dynamics: Exploring the interplay within fintech entrepreneurial ecosystems’, Small Business Economics, Vol. 58 No. 4, pp. 2157–2182.
  4. Apanel, A.P. (2025) ‘The importance of cash and a SWOT analysis of the limits on cash payments’, Economic & Regional Studies/Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Vol. 18 No. 2.
  5. Badak, S., Kolte, V., Agrawal, M. and Gupta, S. (2023) ‘Revolution of digital payment in India’, Journal of Mobile Computing, Communications & Mobile Networks, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 29–37.
  6. Breman, J. (2023) ‘A short history of the informal economy’, Global Labour Journal, Vol. 14 No. 1.
  7. Cornelli, G., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Sinha, S. and Townsend, R.M. (2024) ‘The organisation of digital payments in India–lessons from the Unified Payments Interface (UPI)’, SUERF Policy Note, No. 355, SUERF: The European Money and Finance Forum.
  8. Dzandu, M.D., Hanu, C. and Amegbe, H. (2022) ‘Gamification of mobile money payment for generating customer value in emerging economies: The social impact theory perspective’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 185, p. 122049.
  9. George, A.S., George, A.H., Baskar, T. and Martin, A.G. (2023) ‘An overview of India's Unified Payments Interface (UPI): Benefits, challenges, and opportunities’, Partners Universal International Research Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 16–23.
  10. Ghanad, A. (2023) ‘An overview of quantitative research methods’, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, Vol. 6 No. 8, pp. 3794–3803.
  11. Jaja, I.R., Idoniboye, O. and Amadi, C.C. (2022) ‘A critique of the positivist paradigm in human sciences’, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 224–229.
  12. Jamieson, M.K., Govaart, G.H. and Pownall, M. (2023) ‘Reflexivity in quantitative research: A rationale and beginner's guide’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Vol. 17 No. 4, e12735.
  13. Jebb, A.T., Ng, V. and Tay, L. (2021) ‘A review of key Likert scale development advances: 1995–2019’, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12, p. 637547.
  14. Kanougiya, S., Daruwalla, N., Gram, L., Gupta, A.D., Sivakami, M. and Osrin, D. (2021) ‘Economic abuse and its associations with symptoms of common mental disorders among women in a cross-sectional survey in informal settlements in Mumbai, India’, BMC Public Health, Vol. 21 No. 1, p. 842.
  15. Khan, Z. (2023) ‘An in-depth analysis of the UPI payment system in India’, Advanced Engineering Science, ISSN 2096-3246.
  16. Kirobo, A., Lissah, J. and Govella, M.M. (2022) ‘Adoption of cashless economy in the world: A review’, IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 37–48.
  17. Kumar, V., Lai, K.K., Chang, Y.H., Bhatt, P.C. and Su, F.P. (2021) ‘A structural analysis approach to identify technology innovation and evolution path: A case of m-payment technology ecosystem’, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 477–499.
  18. Kumar, S.V. and Unnisa, N. (2024) ‘A study on UPI transactions in India’, International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research (IJABMR), Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 8–22.
  19. Mahesh, A. and Bhat, G. (2021) ‘Digital payment service in India: A case study of unified payment interface’, International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT and Education (IJCSBE), Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 256–265.
  20. Maksimovic, J. and Evtimov, J. (2023) ‘Positivism and post-positivism as the basis of quantitative research in pedagogy’, Research in Pedagogy, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 208–218.
  21. Malik, S., Maheshwari, G.C. and Singh, A. (2021) ‘Formal vs informal demand for credit by women in urban India: A comparative study in slums of Delhi and Mumbai’, Gender in Management: An International Journal, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 131–148.
  22. Mariana, C.D., Husodo, Z.A., Ekaputra, I.A. and Fahlevi, M. (2025) ‘The advancement of digital payment ecosystem in metaverse: A literature review’, Computers in Human Behavior Reports, Vol. 17, p. 100570.
  23. Márton, A. (2022) ‘Steps toward a digital ecology: Ecological principles for the study of digital ecosystems’, Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 250–265.
  24. Makwana, D., Engineer, P., Dabhi, A. and Chudasama, H. (2023) ‘Sampling methods in research: A review’, International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 762–768.
  25. Mathew, S.M., Joseph, S. and Abraham, M. (2024) ‘Exploring the exponential growth of UPI in India: A study on digital payment transformation (2016–2024)’, Library of Progress – Library Science, Information Technology & Computer, Vol. 44 No. 3.
  26. Mogaji, E. and Nguyen, N.P. (2022) ‘The dark side of mobile money: Perspectives from an emerging economy’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 185, p. 122045.
  27. Mogaji, E. and Nguyen, N.P. (2024) ‘Evaluating the emergence of contactless digital payment technology for transportation’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 203, p. 123378.
  28. Mondal, M. and Chakraborty, C. (2022) ‘The analysis of unparalleled struggle for existence of urban women informal workers in West Bengal, India for survival and resilience to COVID-19 pandemic risk’, GeoJournal, Vol. 87 No. Suppl 4, pp. 607–630.
  29. Mondal, D., Vanbelle, S., Cassese, A. and Candel, M.J. (2024) ‘Review of sample size determination methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in the one-way analysis of variance model’, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 532–553.
  30. Mpofu, F.Y. (2022) ‘Industry 4.0 in financial services: Mobile money taxes, revenue mobilisation, financial inclusion, and the realisation of sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Africa’, Sustainability, Vol. 14 No. 14, p. 8667.
  31. Namahoot, K.S. and Jantasri, V. (2023) ‘Integration of UTAUT model in Thailand cashless payment system adoption: The mediating role of perceived risk and trust’, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 634–658.
  32. Nguyen, T.D., Shih, M.H., Srivastava, D., Tirthapura, S. and Xu, B. (2021) ‘Stratified random sampling from streaming and stored data’, Distributed and Parallel Databases, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 665–710.
  33. Okagbue, H.I., Oguntunde, P.E., Obasi, E.C. and Akhmetshin, E.M. (2021) ‘Trends and usage pattern of SPSS and Minitab software in scientific research’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1734 No. 1, p. 012017.
  34. Osabutey, E.L. and Jackson, T. (2024) ‘Mobile money and financial inclusion in Africa: Emerging themes, challenges and policy implications’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 202, p. 123339.
  35. Paliwal, M., Raj, R., Kumar, V., Singh, S., Sharma, N.K., Suri, A. and Kumari, M. (2024) ‘Informal workers in India as an economic shock absorber in the era of COVID-19: A study on policies and practices’, Human Systems Management, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 17–36.
  36. Páv, M. (2023) ‘Two dimensions of existence of the ‘slum’ in the global city: A comparative case study of informal settlements in Nairobi and Mumbai’, Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 66–93.
  37. Pang, Y.X., Ng, S.H. and Lau, W.T. (2022) ‘Digital cashless payments and economic growth: Evidence from CPMI countries’, Capital Markets Review, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 63–89.
  38. Pitoyo, A.J., Aditya, B., Amri, I. and Rokhim, A.A. (2021) ‘Impacts and strategies behind COVID-19-induced economic crisis: Evidence from informal economy’, The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Vol. 64 No. 3, pp. 641–661.
  39. Putrevu, J. and Mertzanis, C. (2024) ‘The adoption of digital payments in emerging economies: Challenges and policy responses’, Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 476–500.
  40. Qatawneh, N., Al-Okaily, A., Al-Okaily, M. and Ur Rehman, S. (2025) ‘Exploring the antecedent factors of continuous intention to use mobile money: Insights from emerging markets’, Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 175–200.
  41. Rahman, M., Ismail, I., Bahri, S. and Rahman, M.K. (2022) ‘An empirical analysis of cashless payment systems for business transactions’, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 8 No. 4, p. 213.
  42. Raya, J.M. and Vargas, C. (2022) ‘How to become a cashless economy and what are the determinants of eliminating cash’, Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 543–562.
  43. Rui, Z., Yang, C., Zhenying, G. and Bhaumik, A. (2023) ‘A look at the rising popularity of cashless economies around the world’, International Journal on Recent Trends in Business and Tourism (IJRTBT), Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 16–32.
  44. Sarkar, O.T., Hasan, M.A. and Saha, S.K. (2025) ‘Resilience in the informal economy amidst the COVID-19 crisis: The experience of street vendors in Dhaka, Bangladesh’, Urban, Planning and Transport Research, Vol. 13 No. 1, p. 2502001.
  45. Sen, S. and Yildirim, I. (2022) ‘A tutorial on how to conduct meta-analysis with IBM SPSS Statistics’, Psych, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 640–667.
  46. Septiningrum, L., Agustanta, N., Ahdiyana, M., Widianto, H.W. and Pambudi, A. (2024) ‘The theoretical framework of cashless payment systems in Indonesia: Analyzing condition in different era’s’, Natapraja, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 25–42.
  47. Shahid, M. (2022) ‘Exploring the determinants of adoption of Unified Payment Interface (UPI) in India: A study based on diffusion of innovation theory’, Digital Business, Vol. 2 No. 2, p. 100040.
  48. Shaikh, A.A., Glavee-Geo, R., Karjaluoto, H. and Hinson, R.E. (2023) ‘Mobile money as a driver of digital financial inclusion’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 186, p. 122158.
  49. South, L., Saffo, D., Vitek, O., Dunne, C. and Borkin, M.A. (2022) ‘Effective use of Likert scales in visualization evaluations: A systematic review’, Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 43–55.
  50. Sripriya, S.S. (2022) ‘Migrants and their livelihoods in the urban informal sector’, in India Migration Report 2021, Routledge India, pp. 277–291.
  51. Tanha, M., Dolon, M.M.A., Al-Amin, A.A., Nadi, N.A., Islam, M.M. and Ali, M.H. (2024) ‘Factors influencing the development of the cashless payment system: Comprehending the function of the involved participants’, Annals of Management and Organization Research, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 255–270.
  52. Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R.C.I. and Mumu, J. (2022) ‘Likert scale in social sciences research: Problems and difficulties’, FWU Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 89–101.
  53. Wang, P. (2021) ‘Connecting the parts with the whole: Toward an information ecology theory of digital innovation ecosystems’, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 1.
  54. Yu, Z., Guindani, M., Grieco, S.F., Chen, L., Holmes, T.C. and Xu, X. (2022) ‘Beyond t test and ANOVA: Applications of mixed-effects models for more rigorous statistical analysis in neuroscience research’, Neuron, Vol. 110 No. 1, pp. 21–35.