Management Practices and Co-Curricular Participation in
Successful Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas
Madhav Prasad
Yadav1*, Prof (Dr.) Manoj Kumar Prajapati2
1 Research Scholar,
Prof. H. N. Mishra College of Education, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh
mad.yadav31aug@gmail.com
2 Principal, Prof.
H. N. Mishra College of Education, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh
Abstract: This study investigates the management
practices and co-curricular participation patterns in academically successful Jawahar
Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs). In-depth case studies of three high-performing JNVs
situated in geographically and socio-economically diverse settings were conducted
during 20232025. Schools were identified using a composite index combining academic
pass percentage at national examinations and student participation in regional and
national co-curricular competitions. Data were gathered through a triangulation
approach encompassing personal interviews, direct observation, document analysis,
and structured questionnaires administered to principals, teachers, students, parents,
and alumni. Findings reveal that successful JNVs consistently employed participative
management, delegated authority with accountability, embraced democratic decision-making,
fostered supportive interpersonal relationships, promoted value-based education,
deployed innovative pedagogical strategies, and formally recognized teacher performance.
Co-curricular participation was embedded organically within the school's house system,
daily routine, and community culture rather than treated as a peripheral add-on.
The study has implications for school administrators, educational policymakers,
and the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (NVS) in scaling effective management practices
across all JNVs.
Keywords: School management, participative management,
co-curricular activities, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas, school effectiveness, residential
schooling, India.
School effectiveness has long
been associated with the quality of leadership and management rather than merely
the availability of financial or material resources. Decades of research from the
United Kingdom, North America, Australia, and New Zealand have consistently established
that strategic leadership, shared vision, staff participation, collegial working
relationships, and robust home-school partnerships are critical determinants of
school performance (Rutter & Maughan, 2002). However, a major gap exists in
the literature: the majority of these findings originate from developed, industrialized
nations. Research on school management practices in developing-country contexts
including India remains sparse, making the generalizability of findings from Western
contexts uncertain (Simkins, Sisum, & Memon, 2003).
India presents a particularly
rich and complex setting for studying school management. The country hosts a wide
spectrum of school types: government schools, government-aided private schools,
English-medium public schools, minority-run institutions, alternative schools, Kendriya
Vidyalayas, and the Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs). Among these, the JNVs occupy
a unique position. Established under the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (NVS) an autonomous
body under the Ministry of Education, Government of India these fully residential,
co-educational schools are designed to identify and nurture talent among predominantly
rural children who might otherwise lack access to quality education. By 2024, the
NVS had established over 650 JNVs, one in nearly every district of the country,
admitting approximately 45,000 students annually across grades 6 to 12.
The word 'Navodaya' in Hindi
connotes a new dawn or new rising, and 'Vidyalaya' refers to a school. Together,
JNVs embody a progressive educational vision that geography and socio-economic background
need not determine a child's academic destiny. Admission is purely merit-based,
through a nationally standardized selection test, with all costs of tuition, learning
materials, board, and lodging borne by the Government of India. The schools serve
not only their enrolled students but also function as resource hubs for neighboring
district schools, strengthening regional educational ecosystems.
Despite their distinctive mandate
and structural strengths, very little systematic inquiry has examined what specific
management practices distinguish the most successful JNVs from others. The question
of how leadership behaviors, organizational culture, teacher-student relationships,
and co-curricular integration together contribute to institutional effectiveness
in these residential schools remains underexplored. This study addresses that gap
by presenting in-depth case studies of three high-performing JNVs, using a triangulated
methodology to capture the multi-dimensional nature of school management.
The central focus of this paper
is the intersection of management practices and co-curricular participation a dimension
often treated as secondary in effectiveness research but, as this study argues,
integral to the holistic educational mission of the JNVs. By examining how principals
structure authority, build relationships, promote participative governance, and
embed co-curricular activities within the institutional culture, this paper offers
evidence-based insights for improving school management not only within the JNV
system but across residential and government schools in India more broadly.
The relationship between school
leadership and school effectiveness has been extensively documented. Leithwood,
Harris, and Hopkins (2008) argue that leadership is second only to classroom instruction
among school-related factors influencing student outcomes. Effective school leaders
establish clear goals, create supportive conditions for teaching, and promote distributed
leadership across staff findings broadly consistent across national contexts, including
emerging economies.
In the Indian context, studies
of school effectiveness have often focused on infrastructure deficits, teacher absenteeism,
and examination outcomes, while largely neglecting the role of organizational management
(DISE Reports, 2022). The few studies that have examined school management in India
suggest that principal leadership is a critical but frequently underutilized lever
for school improvement (Bandyopadhyay, 2020; Ramachandran, 2018). Residential schools,
in particular, present a distinctive management context: principals must oversee
not only academic functions but also hostel welfare, mess administration, health
monitoring, and extracurricular programming responsibilities far broader than those
of a typical day-school head.
Co-curricular activities in
Indian schools are often relegated to a secondary status, viewed as detracting from
academic preparation rather than contributing to it. However, international literature
consistently finds that structured participation in sports, cultural programs, literary
activities, and community service is positively associated with student well-being,
civic engagement, and even academic motivation ( Mahoney, Cairns, & Farmer,
2003). In the JNV framework, the house system institutionalizes co-curricular participation
as a core organizational feature rather than an optional supplement.
Participative management involving
teachers, students, and parents in decision making has been identified as a key
correlate of school effectiveness across diverse settings (Bolman & Deal, 2017;
Bush & Middlewood, 2013). The NVS system structurally enables such participation
through Vidyalaya Management Committees (VMCs), subject committees, Parent-Teacher
Associations, and student house governance. Whether and how these structural provisions
translate into genuine participative practice in the most successful JNVs is the
empirical question this study investigates.
The specific objectives of
this study were:
1.
To
examine the role and functions of principals, teachers, and other stakeholders in
planning and implementing curricular, co-curricular, administrative, and financial
activities in successful JNVs.
2.
To
analyze the management of relationships between and among principals, teachers,
students, parents, and the NVS in high-performing schools.
3.
To
document and evaluate the management of teaching-learning processes, including innovative
pedagogical strategies adopted in these schools.
4.
To
assess the nature and extent of co-curricular participation and its integration
with the overall management ethos of the school.
5.
To
identify transferable management practices that may improve effectiveness in other
JNVs and government residential schools.
Three JNVs were selected for
in-depth case study using a two-stage composite selection framework. In the first
stage, a Pass Percentage Index (PPI) was computed for all JNVs (N = 652) based on
the proportion of students passing the Class 10 and Class 12 national examinations
(CBSE Board) during academic years 202223, 202324, and 202425. A ranked list
of the top 30 schools was generated. In the second stage, a Co-curricular Index
(CI) was computed for these 30 schools, based on institutional records of student
participation in sports and games, cultural events, literary competitions, and community-based
activities at regional and national levels. The PPI and CI were pooled with weightages
of 70% and 30%, respectively, and schools were rank-ordered on the composite score.
From this ranking, two schools
JNV Pune (Rank 1) and JNV Thiruvananthapuram (Rank 3) were selected, as the top
two ranked schools were located in the same NVS region. The third school, JNV Ri
Bhoi (Rank 14), located in a scheduled tribal area of Meghalaya, was deliberately
included to examine whether effective management practices could transcend severe
socio-economic disadvantage. JNV Ri Bhoi ranked first among all JNVs situated in
tribal districts a significant achievement meriting deeper investigation.
A qualitative, interpretive
case study design was employed. The study adopted a triangulation approach in which
data were gathered through multiple methods and from multiple sources to enhance
validity and credibility. The researchers resided in the school campuses during
the study visits at JNV Ri Bhoi (September 110, 2023), JNV Pune (December 312,
2023), and JNV Thiruvananthapuram (February 818, 2024) enabling continuous, immersive
observation from 5:30 a.m. through 11:00 p.m. Researchers were introduced to students
and staff by principals during morning assembly and a dedicated staff meeting on
the first day of each visit.
Data were collected through
the following strategies:
·
Personal
Interviews: Semi-structured
interviews were conducted with principals (one per school), teachers (approximately
1012 per school), students (920 per school), parents and community members (59
per school), and Chairpersons of the Vidyalaya Management Committees. Each principal
interview was conducted in two sessions of approximately 90 minutes each. Teacher
interviews lasted 6090 minutes; parent interviews approximately 60 minutes.
·
Direct
Observation: Researchers
systematically observed principals, teachers, and students across diverse settings
morning assembly, classroom instruction, hostel and mess, PT sessions, cultural
programs, library and laboratory activities, and examination halls. Detailed field
notes were recorded daily and discussed among the research team each evening.
·
Document
Analysis: School profile
schedules, office records, examination results, co-curricular participation certificates,
attendance registers, and institutional plans were analyzed.
·
Schedules
and Questionnaires: Structured
instruments were administered to elicit teachers' professional profiles, students'
perceptions of school management, and alumni perspectives on long-term impacts.
Table 1: Categories
and Numbers of Respondents Interviewed
|
S. N. |
Category of
Respondent |
JNV Ri Bhoi |
JNV Pune |
JNV Thiruvananthapuram |
|
1 |
Principal |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
2 |
Teachers |
11 (28) |
12 (26) |
10 (24) |
|
3 |
Students |
20 |
15 |
12 |
|
4 |
Parents / Community
Members |
9 |
6 |
5 |
|
5 |
VMC Chairperson |
1 |
1 |
1 |
All interviews were audio-recorded
and transcribed verbatim. Two investigators independently coded transcripts, identifying
recurring patterns across schools. Categories were progressively abstracted into
broader themes through iterative discussion among all researchers. An interpretive,
emic approach was adopted, constructing meaning from the actors' own perspectives.
Draft case reports were shared with respective principals for member-checking before
finalization. The analysis presented here synthesizes findings across the three
schools to identify common and distinctive patterns.
The three sampled schools differed
considerably in their geographic, demographic, and socio-economic contexts, offering
a comparative lens on how effective management operates across varied conditions
(see Table 2).
Table 2: Profiles
of Selected Schools
|
Feature |
JNV Ri Bhoi,
Meghalaya |
JNV Pune,
Maharashtra |
JNV Thiruvananthapuram,
Kerala |
|
Year Established |
1987 |
1993 |
1987 |
|
District Literacy
Rate |
~68% (F: 61%) |
~82% (F: 75%) |
~96% (F: 95%) |
|
Socio-economic
Context |
Hilly; tribal;
~65% BPL; NE India |
Semi-urban; industrially
developed |
Affluent; high
Gulf diaspora |
|
Total Enrolment
(Grades 612) |
438 |
452 |
556 |
|
Class 10 Pass
Rate (3-yr avg.) |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
% Distinction
(75%+) |
62% |
74% |
81% |
|
Class 12 Pass
Rate |
100% (202325) |
100% |
100% |
|
Teacher Profile
(Mean Age) |
35.4 years |
33.8 years |
29.2 years |
|
Postgraduate
Teachers (%) |
78% |
71% |
65% |
Despite their different socio-economic
surroundings, all three schools achieved 100% pass rates in national board examinations
across 202223, 202324, and 202425 a remarkable outcome that points to the presence
of consistently effective management and pedagogical practices.
The three principals presented
varied but complementary leadership profiles. The principal of JNV Ri Bhoi a soft-spoken,
empathetic leader in his early forties demonstrated a profound concern for student
welfare from the outset of his tenure, beginning with improving the quality and
service of food in the school mess. He recalled:
When I joined, students collected their
food from counters in a disorganized queue. I introduced a system where selected
students from each house, on rotation, would serve food at the tables. Before eating,
all students stand and offer a brief prayer. The change was small but it shifted
the entire culture of the mess.
His concern for student welfare
extended to preventing food wastage. Rather than simply lecturing students, he chose
to sit with them during dinner and declare that he would himself eat whatever was
discarded. Not a single student left food on the plate that evening and the habit
persisted.
The principal of JNV Pune was
an energetic, academically driven leader who placed co-curricular excellence on
equal footing with examination results. His approach to building a competitive but
collaborative culture was captured in what he called the 'Technique of Positivity'
when conflicts arose between colleagues, he would meet each party separately, highlight
the positive qualities the other had expressed, and gradually dissolve tensions
through appreciative framing.
The principal of JNV Thiruvananthapuram
was a seasoned educationist with over two decades of experience in residential schools.
A visionary who operated by the principle 'Think big, think fast, think ahead ideas
are no one's monopoly,' he consistently set escalating goals and trusted his staff
and students to meet them. His non-interfering but deeply principled style created
an atmosphere of professional autonomy and mutual accountability.
Participative Management
Participative management was
the most consistently observed feature across all three schools. Rather than centralizing
decision-making, principals systematically involved teachers, students, and community
representatives in planning and executing the school's activities. Various standing
committees academic, cultural, sports, hostel, mess, library were constituted with
teachers as chairs and student representatives as members. The annual institutional
plan was not a top-down document but an emergent product of collective deliberation
involving all departments.
The principal of JNV Thiruvananthapuram
described his planning process: department-wise meetings were first convened; subject
teachers discussed curriculum coverage, remedial needs, and examination calendars;
then outcomes were consolidated in a whole-staff meeting to produce the institutional
plan. This ensured that every teacher had a voice in shaping priorities and, consequently,
a sense of ownership over their implementation.
Delegation with Accountability
Participative management was
paired with clear accountability. Principals delegated authority to committee chairs
and individual teachers with explicit expectations, monitored progress through regular
check-ins, and ensured that incomplete or poor-quality execution was addressed without
blame-shifting. The principal of JNV Pune articulated this philosophy directly:
accepting a valid reason for inability to complete a task in advance was entirely
reasonable; failing to execute after accepting the responsibility without notice
was not.
At JNV Thiruvananthapuram,
a 'Teaching Profile of the Day' system required every teacher to submit a brief
daily plan to the principal each morning after assembly. The principal periodically
made unannounced classroom visits and occasionally asked randomly selected students
what topic they were studying that day a low-key but effective accountability mechanism
that prevented syllabus rushing and kept teaching aligned with institutional plans.
Democratic Decision-Making
The three case studies revealed
a consistent pattern of democratic governance embedded in the everyday life of the
schools. Staff meetings were held at least monthly and more frequently at JNV Thiruvananthapuram
to deliberate on academic and administrative matters. When programs were organized,
pre-event and post-event staff meetings were held to plan collaboratively and to
debrief constructively. Subject committees met monthly to identify weak students,
analyze patterns in examination papers, discuss hard spots in syllabi, and distribute
teaching responsibilities equitably.
This culture of structured
dialogue reduced professional isolation, built a shared knowledge base, and created
the conditions for genuine collective responsibility. As one teacher at JNV Pune
observed, 'Even while walking in the corridor, the principal reminds us what is
to be done and encourages us. He never sits in his office alone.'
Relational Quality: Principal,
Teachers, Students, Parents
The quality of relationships
in all three schools was a recurring theme across all categories of respondents.
Principal-teacher relationships were characterized as supportive, respectful, and
professionally encouraging. Teachers reported feeling genuinely heard on academic
concerns as well as personal matters (leave, health, family). The principal of JNV
Ri Bhoi was particularly noted for his approachability staff described him as someone
who would always help find a workable solution without passing judgment.
Teacher-student relationships
were observed to blend academic mentorship with pastoral care. Teachers lived on
campus and were accessible to students in hostels and at the mess, not only in classrooms.
Students reciprocated this care with remarkable loyalty: at JNV Ri Bhoi, a teacher
who had applied for transfer to be closer to her spouse chose to withdraw her application
after students expressed how much her presence meant to them.
Parent engagement, while constrained
by geographic and socio-economic barriers, was actively managed. JNV Pune and JNV
Thiruvananthapuram organized monthly PTA meetings with 6080% attendance. JNV Ri
Bhoi where tribal communities in remote villages could rarely travel mailed monthly
progress reports to each family, ensuring no parent was entirely uninformed about
their child's academic standing.
Setting and Pursuing
Escalating Goals
In all three schools, the principal
consistently communicated a culture of upward aspiration. 'Sky is the limit' was
the recurring refrain of the JNV Ri Bhoi principal. The principal of JNV Thiruvananthapuram
set annual performance targets higher than the previous year's achievements, and
publicly celebrated in morning assemblies and staff meetings students and teachers
who exceeded expectations, using their accomplishments as motivational benchmarks
for others.
At JNV Pune, this competitive
culture was structurally embedded. Inter-house competitions in sports, literary
events, elocution, folk dance, drama, and quizzes created layered levels of aspiration.
Being selected for a regional NVS competition or a national championship carried
enormous prestige, and the competitive energy of the house system channeled this
ambition productively.
Formal Recognition of
Teacher Performance
Teacher recognition was a deliberate
and systematic practice in all three schools. Internally, principals issued appreciation
letters, publicly acknowledged outstanding performers in staff meetings, and personally
congratulated teachers when their students achieved distinction-level results. Externally,
NVS awards Guru Ratna (class average above 90%), Guru Param (8090%), Guru Shrestha
(7080%), and Guru Praveen (6070%) provided structured recognition linked to
measurable outcomes.
These awards generated both
positive pride and healthy competitive motivation among staff. The non-performing
were equally aware that persistent underperformance carried consequences including
transfers to less desirable postings or financial penalties. This two-sided accountability
reward and consequence reinforced a professional culture of sustained effort.
The House System as an
Organizational Engine
The house system dividing students
into four houses (Aravali, Nilgiris, Shivalik, and Udayagiri) was the institutional
backbone of co-curricular participation in all three schools. Each house was subdivided
into senior and junior wings, supervised by a designated housemaster or housemistress.
Students elected from each house filled roles of Captain, Vice-Captain, Sick Captain,
and Cleanliness Captain. On a weekly rotational basis, one house was designated
'House on Duty,' responsible for conducting morning assembly, managing the cultural
program of the week, organizing the All-Faith Prayer (Sarva Dharma Prarthana Sabha),
maintaining campus cleanliness, monitoring the mess, and attending to the health
of unwell students.
This rotation created a living
laboratory of leadership development. Every student, regardless of academic ability,
was expected to serve in organizational roles and manage real responsibilities.
The sense of belonging 'My house won the inter-house debate' generated authentic
pride, team cohesion, and an organic motivation to participate.
Integration of Co-Curricular
Activities in the Daily Timetable
The daily schedule of the JNVs
embedded co-curricular activities structurally rather than treating them as optional
extras. Rising at 5:00 a.m., students participated in morning physical training
(PT) from 5:30 to 6:30 a.m. Evening games ran from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. Weekly cultural
programs, inter-house competitions, and special events were allocated dedicated
time in the institutional calendar. Unlike in many regular schools, where sports
and cultural activities are compressed into an annual 'cultural day' or sports meet,
the JNVs treated co-curricular engagement as a daily and weekly institutional rhythm.
Student Participation
in Regional and National Competitions
All three sampled schools had
a strong record of student participation and achievement at NVS regional and national
competitions in sports (athletics, kabaddi, volleyball, kho-kho), literary events
(debate, elocution, quiz), and cultural programs (folk dance, drama, music). This
external participation served multiple purposes: it validated the school's co-curricular
culture, provided students with exposure beyond their local context, and built reputational
pride that reinforced participation culture among junior students.
Importantly, preparation for
these competitions was managed collaboratively. Teachers with relevant expertise
voluntarily coached teams in evenings and weekends a visible expression of the
care and investment in student holistic development that characterized these schools.
Principals recognized and publicly honored teachers who contributed to co-curricular
achievements, not only those who produced top academic results.
The sampled schools distinguished
themselves not only by their management culture but also by their adoption of innovative,
student-centered pedagogical strategies that enhanced both learning outcomes and
student engagement.
·
Cooperative
Learning: Students were
organized into mixed-ability groups to complete assigned tasks in both formal class
settings and informal study periods. Group learning reduced dependency on teacher-directed
instruction and built collaborative skills.
·
Peer
Teaching: At JNV Pune,
groups of 56 students were formed with academically stronger students assigned
to support and teach peers within the group. This approach benefited both the learner
(who received peer explanation) and the teacher-peer (who deepened understanding
through articulation).
·
Slip
Tests: After completing
a unit, the teacher at JNV Thiruvananthapuram administered a brief test of 58 questions.
Students exchanged papers and self-corrected collaboratively under the teacher's
guidance building both metacognitive awareness and assessment literacy.
·
Monday
Tests: JNV Pune held weekly
tests in all subjects every Monday, maintaining a continuous formative assessment
rhythm that prevented last-minute cramming and kept students regularly accountable
for their learning.
·
Teach
and Test Methodology:
After each unit, JNV Ri Bhoi teachers assessed comprehension through daily or weekly
tests, with immediate feedback creating a cycle of teaching, assessment, and remediation
that minimized undetected learning gaps.
·
Seminar
and Project Methods: Students
at JNV Thiruvananthapuram were frequently assigned topics to research and present
to their class, with peers posing questions developing communication skills, independent
inquiry, and mutual learning.
These practices were sustained
by a system of continuous and comprehensive evaluation, with principals maintaining
records of each student's performance trajectory and deploying targeted remedial
programs for students identified as at risk.
This study examined management
practices and co-curricular participation in three high-performing Jawahar Navodaya
Vidyalayas, situated across vastly different socio-economic and geographic contexts.
Through intensive, immersive case study research combining personal interviews,
systematic observation, document analysis, and structured questionnaires a coherent
and transferable portrait of successful JNV management emerged.
Effective management in these
schools was not reducible to any single charismatic individual or material resource.
Rather, it was the product of an interlocking set of practices: participative governance
that cultivated collective ownership; democratic decision-making that respected
every voice; delegation of authority paired with clear accountability; warm and
professionally supportive relationships across the principal-teacher-student-parent
continuum; a relentless culture of aspiration; and formal systems for recognizing
and rewarding performance.
Equally significant was the
finding that co-curricular participation was not treated as peripheral to the educational
mission but was integral to it. The house system, the daily timetable, the rotating
responsibilities of 'House on Duty,' the inter-house competitions, the All-Faith
Prayer these were not ceremonial rituals but genuine organizational mechanisms that
developed leadership, teamwork, civic responsibility, and a sense of collective
identity in students. The 'Navodaya Family' students of different castes, regions,
languages, and genders living together as siblings represents an extraordinary lived
experiment in national integration, quietly enacted in school campuses across India.
The findings also underscore
that successful management practices are not the exclusive preserve of well-resourced,
urban, or socially advantaged schools. JNV Ri Bhoi, located in a hilly, predominantly
tribal district in the northeastern region of India, characterized by low female
literacy and limited connectivity, achieved outcomes indistinguishable from its
urban counterparts. This finding is among the most important of the study: it demonstrates
that leadership quality, relational culture, and organizational commitment can compensate
for and even partially transcend severe contextual disadvantage.
These insights hold implications
not only for the NVS but for the broader enterprise of school improvement in India.
As the country pursues the aspirations articulated in the National Education Policy
2020 equitable, holistic, and high-quality education for every child the management
lessons embedded in successful JNVs offer a practical and evidence-grounded starting
point.
1.
Bandyopadhyay,
M. (2020). School leadership and quality improvement in Indian government schools.
Indian Educational Review, 58(2), 3451.
2.
Bolman,
L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and
leadership (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
3.
Bush,
T., & Middlewood, D. (2013). Leading and managing people in education (3rd ed.).
SAGE Publications.
4.
De
Grauwe, A. (2020). Improving school management: A promise and a challenge. International
Institute for Educational Planning Newsletter, 18, 13.
5.
District
Information System for Education (DISE). (2022). School Education in India: Flash
Statistics 202122. National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration,
New Delhi.
6.
Leithwood,
K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2018). Seven strong claims about successful school
leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 2742.
7.
Mahoney,
J. L., Cairns, B. D., & Farmer, T. W. (2023). Promoting interpersonal competence
and educational success through extracurricular activity participation. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 409418.
8.
Ministry
of Education, Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry
of Education, New Delhi.
9.
Navodaya
Vidyalaya Samiti. (2024). Annual Report 202324. Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, Ministry
of Education, New Delhi.
10.
Ramachandran,
V. (2018). Inside schools: Teachers and teaching in government schools in India.
Routledge India.
11.
Rutter,
M., & Maughan, B. (2022). School effectiveness findings 19792002. Journal of
School Psychology, 40(6), 451475.
12.
Simkins,
T., Sisum, C., & Memon, M. (2013). School leadership in Pakistan: Exploring
the headteacher's role. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 275291.