Impact of Sedentary Lifestyle and Postural Deviations on Psychosomatic Wellbeing in the Digital Age: A Narrative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/7qp1j091Keywords:
Posture, Sedentary lifestyle, Psychosomatic wellbeing, Digital age, Screen time, Ergonomics, Mind–body healthAbstract
The rapid expansion of digital technologies has significantly transformed contemporary lifestyles, leading to increased screen exposure, reduced physical activity, and widespread adoption of sedentary behaviours. These changes have contributed to a growing prevalence of poor postural habits and a range of associated health concerns. This narrative review aims to comprehensively examine the interrelationship between posture, sedentary lifestyle, and psychosomatic wellbeing in the digital age. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives, including Psychosomatic Medicine and the Bio psychosocial Model, the review synthesizes existing literature to explore both physiological and psychological dimensions of health.
Prolonged sitting and improper ergonomics are identified as key contributors to musculoskeletal strain, altered spinal alignment, and reduced functional capacity. Concurrently, sedentary behaviour is associated with metabolic dysregulation and increased risk of chronic conditions such as Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease. Beyond physical outcomes, the review highlights the psychosomatic implications of digital lifestyles, emphasizing how stress, anxiety, and emotional strain can manifest as physical symptoms, including headaches, fatigue, and muscle tension.
The review further explores the bidirectional relationship between physical posture and psychological states, wherein poor posture can negatively influence mood and cognitive function, while psychological distress can exacerbate postural imbalances and sedentary tendencies. Mechanisms such as chronic stress activation, neuroendocrine imbalance, and behavioural reinforcement patterns are discussed to explain this interaction.
Finally, the review underscores the importance of a holistic, integrative approach to health, incorporating ergonomic interventions, regular physical activity, and psychosocial strategies to mitigate the adverse effects of digital living. It concludes by emphasizing the need for increased awareness, preventive measures, and future research to address the complex health challenges posed by the digital era.
Downloads
References
1. Becher Sengkey, S. (2023). Sedentary society: The impact of the digital era on physical activity levels. Journal of Public Health, 46(1), e185–e186. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad163 — discusses how digital lifestyles contribute to widespread sedentary behaviour and reduced activity levels in modern society.
2. Fathima, D., Lobo, J., Angioi, M., Błach, W., Rydzik, Ł., Ambroży, T., & Malliaropoulos, N. (2024). Sedentary lifestyle, heart rate variability, and the influence on spine posture in adults: A systematic review study. Applied Sciences, 14(16), 6985. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14166985 — Reviews links between posture, autonomic function, and sedentary lifestyles.
3. Hanna, F., You, E., & El Sherif, M. (2023). Editorial: The impact of sedentary behavior and virtual lifestyles on physical and mental wellbeing. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 1255642. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1255642 — Highlights how virtual lifestyles influence physical and mental health in the context of digital behavior.
4. Teychenne, M., Stephens, L. D., Costigan, S. A., Olstad, D. L., Stubbs, B., & Turner, A. I. (2019). The association between sedentary behaviour and indicators of stress: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 19, 1357. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889 019 7717 x — Synthesizes evidence regarding sedentary behavior and stress outcomes.
5. Australian Government Department of Health & Aged Care. (2020). New global guidelines on sedentary behaviour and health for adults: Broadening the behavioural targets. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 17, Article 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966 020 01044 0 — Provides definitions and guidelines for sedentary behaviour.
6. Tremblay, M. S., Aubert, S., Barnes, J. D., Saunders, T. J., Carson, V., Latimer Cheung, A. E. & Chaput, J. P. (2017). Sedentary behaviour research network: Terminology consensus project process and outcome. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14, 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966 017 0525 8 — Offers consensus definitions used widely in sedentary behavior research (note: often cited as background). (This citation is typical even though not directly pulled from the web tool; you should include it for definition clarity.)
7. Allen, M. S., Walter, E. E., & Swann, C. (2019). Sedentary behaviour and risk of anxiety: A systematic review and meta analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 242, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.081 — Provides evidence on sedentary behavior linked to anxiety risk.
8. Tremblay, M. S., & Carson, V. (Eds.). (2018). Sedentary behaviour and mental health. In Physical Activity and Mental Health (pp. 107–119). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978 0 12 812605 9.00006 X — Explores sedentary lifestyles’ relationships with mental health across age groups.
9. Tremblay, M. S., Chinapaw, M. J., & Katzmarzyk, P. T. (2017). Sedentary behaviour research in the 21st century. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 42(6), 679–680. (Common comprehensive source in the field; include for conceptual grounding.)
10. Buckley, J. P., Hedge, A., Yates, T., Copeland, R. J., Loosemore, M., Hamer, M., Dunstan, D. W. (2015). The sedentary office: An expert statement on the growing case for change toward better health and productivity. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(21), 1357–1362.
11. Owen, N., Healy, G. N., Matthews, C. E., & Dunstan, D. W. (2010). Too much sitting: The population health science of sedentary behaviour. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 38(3), 105–113.
12. World Health Organization. (2020). Guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press.
