Doing Activities in Science: A study of middle school classrooms

Authors

  • Dr. Susmita Ram Associate Professor, Department of Elementary Education,Jesus and Mary College, University of Delhi, Delhi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29070/38wa5w76

Keywords:

science education, activities in science, science policies

Abstract

This study examines the nature and purpose of science activities in middle school classrooms across a cross-section of schools in Delhi and explores the relationship between teachers’ beliefs about science education and their classroom practices. Using a qualitative microethnographic approach, the researcher observed 24 science teachers from nine low-, middle-, and high-fee schools in Delhi over six months and conducted semi-structured interviews with them. The findings reveal considerable disparities in the availability and use of science activities across different school contexts. In most classrooms, activities were primarily used to verify concepts already taught rather than to promote inquiry, exploration, or the development of scientific process skills. Students were often expected to follow prescribed procedures or merely record experiments without actively engaging in scientific investigation. Teachers identified constraints such as limited resources, lack of time, heavy workloads, examination pressures, and insufficient institutional support as barriers to implementing experiential learning. The study concludes that meaningful science education requires not only improved infrastructure but also sustained professional development, supportive school environments, and pedagogical reforms that encourage inquiry-based learning. These findings are particularly relevant in the context of the National Curriculum Framework (2023), which advocates active, hands-on engagement as the foundation of science learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969.

2. Abrams, E. (2005). Talking and doing science: Important elements in a teaching-for-understanding approach. In J. Mintzes, J. Wandersee, & J. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding (pp. 307–323). Academic Press.

3. Bajracharya, R. K. (1986). Study of science education in secondary schools of Nepal with a view to evolving a functional model for improving science education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Delhi.

4. Collette, A. T., & Chiappetta, E. L. (1984). Science instruction in middle and secondary schools. Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing.

5. Dewey, J. (1916). Methods in science teaching. General Science Quarterly, 1(1).

6. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). Macmillan.

7. Ganguly, B. (1991). Content and processes in science. National Council of Educational Research and Training.

8. Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

9. Morey, M. K. (1990). Status of science education in Illinois elementary schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(4), 387–398.

10. Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553–576.

11. Ogawa, M. (1998). A cultural history of science education in Japan: An epic description. In W. W. Cobern (Ed.), Socio-cultural perspectives on science education: An international dialogue. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

12. Russell, B. (1926). On education. Unwin HymanSchwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science. Harvard University Press.

13. Stevens, M. (1996). A survey of teaching methodologies to grades K–8 in San Bernardino County, California (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(6), 2424-A.

14. Tamir, P. (1976). The role of the laboratory in science teaching (Technical Report No. 10). The University of Iowa.

15. Tamir, P., & Lunetta, V. N. (1981). Science teaching in the middle and secondary schools. Mosby College Publishing.

16. Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403–418.

17. Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Australian Council for Educational Research.

18. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (1964). Report of the UNESCO planning mission (1964): Science and mathematics education in Indian schools.

19. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (1975). The curriculum for the ten-year school: A framework.

20. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (1986a). National curriculum for elementary and secondary education: A framework.

21. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (1986b). National policy on education.

22. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (1986c). Science education for the first ten years of schooling.

23. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (1989). School science education in India: A resource book.

24. National Education Policy 2020. (2020). Ministry of Education, Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf

25. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2005). National curriculum framework 2005. https://ncert.nic.in/pdf/nc-framework/nf2005-english.pdf

26. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2023). National curriculum framework for school education 2023. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/ncf_2023.pdf

27. Secondary Education Commission. (1953). Report of the Secondary Education Commission (1952–53). Government of India. (Reprinted 1965)

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

[1]
“Doing Activities in Science: A study of middle school classrooms”, JASRAE, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1115–1145, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.29070/38wa5w76.