Internationally Applied Mechanisms for Regulation of Child Labour
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/yypwee48Keywords:
Child Labour, United Kingdom, US, India, Regulation, RightsAbstract
The issue of child labour continues to be a global challenge that undermines children’s rights, education, and well-being. This paper reviews internationally applied mechanisms for regulating child labour by examining policies and practices adopted by countries such as the United Kingdom, the United States, the Philippines, Brazil, and India. Each case reflects distinct historical, economic, and socio-political contexts that have shaped their approaches to child labour regulation. In developed nations like the UK and the US, legislative frameworks such as the Factory and Workshop Act of 1878 and the Keating-Owen Act of 1916 marked early milestones in abolishing child labour through education and legal reform. Developing nations such as the Philippines, Brazil, and India, on the other hand, face persistent challenges linked to poverty, lack of education, and social inequality. These nations have implemented multi-sectoral strategies involving international collaborations, community participation, and educational initiatives to curb child labour. Despite varying progress, the collective international effort underscores the importance of legislative enforcement, awareness, and socio-economic empowerment in achieving sustainable elimination of child labour. The study highlights that only through integrated approaches addressing poverty, education, and human rights can meaningful progress be achieved in eradicating child exploitation globally.
Downloads
References
1. Burns H.Weston (ed.), Child Labour and Human Rights 55-63(Lynne Rienner Publishers, Colorado/UK, 2005)
2. The Factory and Workshop Act 1878 (41 & 42 Vict. C.16) which brought all the previous Acts together in a consolidated form.
3. The Elementary Education Act, 1880 (39 & 40 Vict. C.79) and shall be construed as one with Elementary Education Act, 1876 and both cited together as the Elementary Education Act, 1876 (33&34 Vict. C.75) and 1880.
4. Keating-Owen Act on Child Labour, Pub. L. No.64-249, 39 Stat. 675 (1916)
5. Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251 (1918)
6. Thomson (ed.), 2 Encyclopedia of American Law (GALE, Detroit, 2nd edn).
7. A regional opinion survey among young people aged nine to seventeen by UNICEF (“Speaking Out!”)
8. Supra 17 at 198-201
9. https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-todya/philippines-arcibishop-spend-stop-child-labornotcondoms
10. In 1996, the Brazilian federal government created PETI, a program for eradication of child labour run by the Ministry of Social Welfare.
11. Supra note 44
12. Supra note 17 at 209, 215-230
13. Made in Brazil:Confronting Child Labor available at www.cetri.be/Made-in-BrazilConfronting-Child?lang=fr (Last visited on 5.9.2016)
14. Dipak Das, Child Labour in India Rights, Welfare and Protection 3 (Deep & Deep Publications Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2011)
15. Dr.P.K. Padhi (ed.), Child Labour Retrospect & Prospect 62 (The Law, Cuttack, 1998)
16. Jayashree v. Doddawadmath, “Eradication of exploitation of child labour – A critique” XXXII (1&2) IBR 260 (2005)
17. Dr. Ashoka, Child and the Law 9-10 (Sudha Publication, Mysore, Karnataka, 2006)
18. Bhanwar Lal Harish, “Child Labour: The Indian Scenario” 2 Lab IC 97-102(2007)
19. Ibid Article 39(f)
20. Constitution of India Article 39(e)
21. Govt. of India adopted the National Policy for Children by Resolution No.1-14/74-CDD dated August 22, 1974.
22. R.Swaroop, CHILD LABOUR Welcome Measures, Half-hearted Actions, 12-13(ALD Publications, Hyderabad, 2008)
23. The Union Ministry of Labour constituted National Authority for Elimination of Child Labour (NAECL) on 26th September, 1994. It is headed by Union Minister for Labour with Secretaries of the Ministries/Departments of Labour, Human Resource Development, Information and Broadcasting Social justice and Empowerment, Rural Development, Textiles, Expenditure, Health & Family Welfare& Women and Child Development as its members.
24. O.P. Maurya, “Child Labour in India” 36 IJIR 495-496(2001)