Victimhood and control: A comparative review of victim and manipulator perspectives in M C beaton’s hamish macbeth novels
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/jsyng221Keywords:
Interpersonal manipulation, victimhood, cozy mystery, M C Beaton, Hamish MacbethAbstract
This paper examines the dynamics of victimhood and manipulation in M C Beaton’s Hamish Macbeth series through a comparative conceptual review. A recurrent topic in literary works is the manipulation of interpersonal relationships, which is frequently investigated through the use of control, deceit, and exploitation methods. On the other hand, cosy mystery literature, and Beaton's works in particular, continue to be underexplored in this sense. The purpose of this study is to shed light on the psychological and linguistic aspects of control and submission within the context of small community settings by focussing on how manipulative individuals exert their dominance and how victims react to it.The study is conducted using a technique that is based on reviews, and it relies solely on secondary sources such as scholarly publications, literary evaluations, and theoretical models. An method known as theme synthesis is utilised in order to recognise, classify, and analyse recurrent concepts that are associated with manipulative strategies, victim vulnerabilities, and narrative framing.
The study focusses on three primary aspects or components. To begin, it is demonstrated that manipulation is a significant factor in both the course of the story and the tension between the characters. Some archetypes, such as the attractive deceiver, the ruthless schemer, or the gossip monger, are used to frame manipulators. These archetypes disclose the hidden motivations of manipulators, which are often related to greed, jealously, or self-preservation. Second, victims are designed as mirrors of social weakness, and their transitions from innocence to recognition shape both empathy and dramatic tension. This is because victims are reflections of social vulnerability. Third, the Highland community and the norms of the cosy mystery genre increase manipulation by enclosing it in rumours, secrecy, and moral demands rather than in overt acts of violence.
Taking into consideration the data, it appears that manipulation serves not only as a destructive force but also as a narrative glue, ensuring that character development and story resolution are maintained. The study makes a contribution to the academic field of cosy mysteries by including psychological, linguistic, and literary aspects. Additionally, it provides a comparative framework for future research into the interaction between manipulators and victims in literary works.
Downloads
References
1. Boulton, J. (2019). Vulnerability and trust in narrative fiction: A victim-centered approach. Journal of Literary Theory, 13(1), 45–62.
2. Chiluwa, I., & Ifukor, P. (2019). Pragmatics of silence: Power and manipulation in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 142(1), 161–173.
3. Dentith, S. (2020). Tricksters and deceivers in modern fiction: The persistence of archetypes. Journal of Literary Studies, 36(4), 455–472.
4. Eckert, P. (2020). Gossip as a cultural practice: Language, power, and community. Language in Society, 49(2), 161–182.
5. Fludernik, M. (2022). Narrative framing and the ethics of perspective. Poetics Today, 43(1), 1–24.
6. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216.
7. Hanson, C. (2022). Empathy, suspense, and moral ambiguity in contemporary detective fiction. Clues: A Journal of Detection, 40(2), 15–28.
8. Hoffman, M. (2020). Recognizing manipulation: Victim awareness and resistance in modern fiction. Narrative Inquiry, 30(2), 177–194.
9. Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and tactics of manipulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 521–526.
10. Láng, A., & Bőthe, B. (2021). Emotional manipulation strategies and their psychological correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110542.
11. Miller, A. (2021). Psychological realism in the cozy mystery genre. Studies in Popular Culture, 43(1), 91–109.
12. Milroy, L., & Gordon, M. (2019). Social networks, power, and identity in small communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 23(3), 301–320.
13. Ovshieva, N. L. (2022). On the use of manipulative techniques in English literary discourse. Vestnik Samara University. History, Pedagogics, Philology, 28(2), 124–134.
14. Pemberton, A. (2019). Stories of injustice: Towards a narrative victimology. Crime, Media, Culture, 15(3), 341–358.
15. Rimmon-Kenan, S. (2020). Character archetypes and narrative function revisited. Poetics Today, 41(3), 367–389.
16. Sweet, P. L. (2019). The sociology of gaslighting. American Sociological Review, 84(5), 851–875.
17. Sweet, P. L. (2019). The sociology of gaslighting. American Sociological Review, 84(5), 851–875
18. Thompson, L. (2016). Literary manipulation in David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest. Contemporary Literature, 57(2), 234–260
19. Tzanetakis, M. (2019). Literary vulnerability and manipulation: Constructing victims in narrative fiction. Poetics Today, 40(2), 223–242.






