Biocontrol Potential of Trichoderma Harzianum and Trichoderma Viride Against Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens

Authors

  • Dr. Priti Singh Head of Department, Department of Botany, SN Sen BVPG College, Kanpur, U.P. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29070/hgh0kh22

Keywords:

Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma viride, biological control, soil borne pathogens, mycoparasitism, induced systemic resistance, integrated disease management

Abstract

Soil-borne fungi and oomycetes like Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, Pythium, and Sclerotium annually steal a significant proportion of yield from vegetables, pulses, and field crops. Their ability to persist and persist in an effective form in the soil matrix makes them difficult targets for control using either conventional chemical control (or for many oomycetes, biological control using predatory chemicals) alone, and the reliance by large crop and horticultural enterprises upon chemical fumigants and fungicides (at least over time) has recently had to be questioned due to the effects of this practice upon the soil fauna flora environment and human health. Biological control by fungi (most particularly the filamentous fungi Trichoderma harzianum and T. viride), has because of this received much attention in the last few decades, and the two species are now some of the largest selling and most researched formulations used in the direct biological control of plant pathogens. This review gives a summary of the current knowledge of the mode of action of these two Trichoderma species. The group discusses their taxonomy and ecology, the main modes of their activity (mycoparasitism antibiosis competition, induced resistance induction and plant growth stimulation), the laboratory procedures used to test antagonism, a summary of their performance against the major pathogens and practical points on formulation and deployment in the field, taking Indian situations into account. They examine why biocontrol results are so inconsistent by considering strain identification, soil factors and product quality. Overall the data give the impression that T. harzianum and T. viride can be an important component of integrated disease management, mostly when used preventively, but do not offer a replacement for crop rotation, field hygiene and resistant varieties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bell DK, Wells HD, Markham CR (1982) In vitro antagonism of Trichoderma species against six fungal plant pathogens. Phytopathology 72:379–382

2. Benítez T, Rincón AM, Limón MC, Codón AC (2004) Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. International Microbiology 7:249–260

3. Bissett J (1991) A revision of the genus Trichoderma. II. Infrageneric classification. Canadian Journal of Botany 69:2357–2372

4. Brian PW, McGowan JC (1945) Viridin: a highly fungistatic substance produced by Trichoderma viride. Nature 156:144–145

5. Chaverri P, Branco-Rocha F, Jaklitsch W, Gazis R, Degenkolb T, Samuels GJ (2015) Systematics of the Trichoderma harzianum species complex and the re-identification of commercial biocontrol strains. Mycologia 107:558–590

6. Chet I, Harman GE, Baker R (1981) Trichoderma hamatum: its hyphal interactions with Rhizoctonia solani and Pythium spp. Microbial Ecology 7:29–38

7. Chet I, Inbar J (1994) Biological control of fungal pathogens. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 48:37–43

8. Dennis C, Webster J (1971a) Antagonistic properties of species-groups of Trichoderma. I. Production of non-volatile antibiotics. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 57:25–39

9. Dennis C, Webster J (1971b) Antagonistic properties of species-groups of Trichoderma. II. Production of volatile antibiotics. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 57:41–48

10. Dennis C, Webster J (1971c) Antagonistic properties of species-groups of Trichoderma. III. Hyphal interaction. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 57:363–369

11. Druzhinina IS, Seidl-Seiboth V, Herrera-Estrella A, Horwitz BA, Kenerley CM, Monte E, Mukherjee PK, Zeilinger S, Grigoriev IV, Kubicek CP (2011) Trichoderma: the genomics of opportunistic success. Nature Reviews Microbiology 9:749–759

12. Dubey SC, Suresh M, Singh B (2007) Evaluation of Trichoderma species against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris for integrated management of chickpea wilt. Biological Control 40:118–127

13. Elad Y (2000) Biological control of foliar pathogens by means of Trichoderma harzianum and potential modes of action. Crop Protection 19:709–714

14. Elad Y, Chet I, Boyle P, Henis Y (1983) Parasitism of Trichoderma spp. on Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii: scanning electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy. Phytopathology 73:85–88

15. Elad Y, Chet I, Henis Y (1981) A selective medium for improving quantitative isolation of Trichoderma spp. from soil. Phytoparasitica 9:59–67

16. Harman GE (2006) Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology 96:190–194

17. Harman GE, Björkman T (1998) Potential and existing uses of Trichoderma and Gliocladium for plant disease control and plant growth enhancement. In: Harman GE, Kubicek CP (eds) Trichoderma and Gliocladium, Vol 2. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 229–265

18. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M (2004) Trichoderma species: opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2:43–56

19. Hermosa R, Viterbo A, Chet I, Monte E (2012) Plant-beneficial effects of Trichoderma and of its genes. Microbiology 158:17–25

20. Howell CR (2003) Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: the history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Disease 87:4–10

21. Kubicek CP, Herrera-Estrella A, Seidl-Seiboth V, et al. (2011) Comparative genome sequence analysis underscores mycoparasitism as the ancestral life style of Trichoderma. Genome Biology 12:R40

22. Lorito M, Woo SL, Harman GE, Monte E (2010) Translational research on Trichoderma: from 'omics to the field. Annual Review of Phytopathology 48:395–417

23. Mukherjee PK, Horwitz BA, Herrera-Estrella A, Schmoll M, Kenerley CM (2013) Trichoderma research in the genome era. Annual Review of Phytopathology 51:105–129

24. Papavizas GC (1985) Trichoderma and Gliocladium: biology, ecology, and potential for biocontrol. Annual Review of Phytopathology 23:23–54

25. Punja ZK, Utkhede RS (2003) Using fungi and yeasts to manage vegetable crop diseases. Trends in Biotechnology 21:400–407

26. Reino JL, Guerrero RF, Hernández-Galán R, Collado IG (2008) Secondary metabolites from species of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma. Phytochemistry Reviews 7:89–123

27. Rifai MA (1969) A revision of the genus Trichoderma. Mycological Papers 116:1–56

28. Samuels GJ (2006) Trichoderma: systematics, the sexual state, and ecology. Phytopathology 96:195–206

29. Sharma P, Sharma M, Raja M, Shanmugam V (2014) Status of Trichoderma research in India: a review. Indian Phytopathology 67:1–19

30. Shoresh M, Harman GE, Mastouri F (2010) Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annual Review of Phytopathology 48:21–43

31. Sivan A, Chet I (1986) Biological control of Fusarium spp. in cotton, wheat and muskmelon by Trichoderma harzianum. Journal of Phytopathology 116:39–47

32. Skidmore AM, Dickinson CH (1976) Colony interactions and hyphal interference between Septoria nodorum and phylloplane fungi. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 66:57–64

33. Vey A, Hoagland RE, Butt TM (2001) Toxic metabolites of fungal biocontrol agents. In: Butt TM, Jackson C, Magan N (eds) Fungi as biocontrol agents: progress, problems and potential. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 311–346

34. Vincent JM (1947) Distortion of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitors. Nature 159:850

35. Vinale F, Marra R, Scala F, Ghisalberti EL, Lorito M, Sivasithamparam K (2006) Major secondary metabolites produced by two commercial Trichoderma strains active against different phytopathogens. Letters in Applied Microbiology 43:143–148

36. Vinale F, Sivasithamparam K, Ghisalberti EL, Marra R, Woo SL, Lorito M (2008) Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40:1–10

37. Vinale F, Flematti G, Sivasithamparam K, Lorito M, Marra R, Skelton BW, Ghisalberti EL (2009) Harzianic acid, an antifungal and plant growth promoting metabolite from Trichoderma harzianum. Journal of Natural Products 72:2032–2035

38. Viterbo A, Ramot O, Chernin L, Chet I (2002) Significance of lytic enzymes from Trichoderma spp. in the biocontrol of fungal plant pathogens. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 81:549–556

39. Weindling R (1932) Trichoderma lignorum as a parasite of other soil fungi. Phytopathology 22:837–845

40. Woo SL, Ruocco M, Vinale F, Nigro M, Marra R, Lombardi N, Pascale A, Lanzuise S, Manganiello G, Lorito M (2014) Trichoderma-based products and their widespread use in agriculture. The Open Mycology Journal 8:71–126

41. Yedidia I, Benhamou N, Chet I (1999) Induction of defense responses in cucumber plants by the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65:1061–1070

42. Zeilinger S, Omann M (2007) Trichoderma biocontrol: signal transduction pathways involved in host sensing and mycoparasitism. Gene Regulation and Systems Biology 1:227–234

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

[1]
“Biocontrol Potential of Trichoderma Harzianum and Trichoderma Viride Against Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens”, JASRAE, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 488–508, July 2026, doi: 10.29070/hgh0kh22.