Management Practices and Co-Curricular Participation in Successful Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas

Authors

  • Madhav Prasad Yadav Research Scholar, Prof. H. N. Mishra College of Education, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh Author
  • Prof (Dr.) Manoj Kumar Prajapati Principal, Prof. H. N. Mishra College of Education, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29070/wwqg4550

Keywords:

School management, participative management, co-curricular activities, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas, school effectiveness, residential schooling, India

Abstract

This study investigates the management practices and co-curricular participation patterns in academically successful Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs). In-depth case studies of three high-performing JNVs situated in geographically and socio-economically diverse settings were conducted during 2023–2025. Schools were identified using a composite index combining academic pass percentage at national examinations and student participation in regional and national co-curricular competitions. Data were gathered through a triangulation approach encompassing personal interviews, direct observation, document analysis, and structured questionnaires administered to principals, teachers, students, parents, and alumni. Findings reveal that successful JNVs consistently employed participative management, delegated authority with accountability, embraced democratic decision-making, fostered supportive interpersonal relationships, promoted value-based education, deployed innovative pedagogical strategies, and formally recognized teacher performance. Co-curricular participation was embedded organically within the school's house system, daily routine, and community culture rather than treated as a peripheral add-on. The study has implications for school administrators, educational policymakers, and the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (NVS) in scaling effective management practices across all JNVs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bandyopadhyay, M. (2020). School leadership and quality improvement in Indian government schools. Indian Educational Review, 58(2), 34–51.

2. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

3. Bush, T., & Middlewood, D. (2013). Leading and managing people in education (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

4. De Grauwe, A. (2020). Improving school management: A promise and a challenge. International Institute for Educational Planning Newsletter, 18, 1–3.

5. District Information System for Education (DISE). (2022). School Education in India: Flash Statistics 2021–22. National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration, New Delhi.

6. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2018). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42.

7. Mahoney, J. L., Cairns, B. D., & Farmer, T. W. (2023). Promoting interpersonal competence and educational success through extracurricular activity participation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 409–418.

8. Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education, New Delhi.

9. Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti. (2024). Annual Report 2023–24. Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, Ministry of Education, New Delhi.

10. Ramachandran, V. (2018). Inside schools: Teachers and teaching in government schools in India. Routledge India.

11. Rutter, M., & Maughan, B. (2022). School effectiveness findings 1979–2002. Journal of School Psychology, 40(6), 451–475.

12. Simkins, T., Sisum, C., & Memon, M. (2013). School leadership in Pakistan: Exploring the headteacher's role. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 275–291.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01